Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Philip Bester vs Clay Thompson Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bester vs Thompson analysis and find out who is favored!
Philip Bester vs Clay Thompson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bester 2 - 1 Thompson
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bester has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Thompson has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bester, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Thompson has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bester has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Thompson has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bester has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Thompson winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bester has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 60/ 38), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Thompson has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 14/ 8), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Bester winning 2 times and Thompson being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Bester winning 4 and Thompson winning 2. The last match between Bester and Thompson was at the USA F1, 09-01-2016, Semifinals, Hard with Philip Bester getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:10:25.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bester and Thompson have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bester winning 0 times and Thompson 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bester winning 0, and Thompson 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bester has played against opponents with an average rank of while Thompson has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bester has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Thompson has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bester has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Thompson has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
225
High
35
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
2
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
408
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
57% (307-234)
Career Total W/L
58% (90-66)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$11,495
Career Prize Money
$920
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Philip Bester | Clay Thompson |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 32 | 25 |
| Aces (Total) | 19 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 10 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:10:25 | 1:10:25 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (92/170) | 59% (99/169) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (69/92) | 65% (64/99) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (41/78) | 50% (35/70) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 53% (9/17) | 46% (6/13) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (70/169) | 35% (60/170) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Philip Bester
Player
Clay Thompson
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
42%
(
20 of
48)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Philip Bester
Player
Clay Thompson
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
81%
(
17 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats
Clay Thompson
Player
Philip Bester
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Philip Bester | Clay Thompson |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Philip Bester Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Philip Bester
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
44 of
80)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Mcgee
Player
Philip Bester
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
64)
4
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
5
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan King
Player
Philip Bester
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Philip Bester
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
8
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Philip Bester
48%
(
41 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
71 of
101)
12
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
70%
(
31 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blaz Rola
Player
Philip Bester
61%
(
61 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
58 of
100)
6
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 | 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Bester
Player
Mark Verryth
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
7
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
25 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Clay Thompson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Clay Thompson
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan King
Player
Clay Thompson
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
5
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
9
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 7-5 6-7(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Clay Thompson
Player
Ricardo Hocevar
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
15
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Clay Thompson
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
47%
(
30 of
64)
2
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
7
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
64)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clay Thompson
Player
Ryoto Tachi
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
8
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bjorn Fratangelo
Player
Clay Thompson
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clay Thompson
Player
John Lamble
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Marinko Matosevic
Player
Clay Thompson
52%
(
46 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
13
Aces
12
7
Double Faults
5
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
44 of
58)
65%
(
28 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
25 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clay Thompson
Player
Beck Pennington
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
11
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Bester Vs Thompson Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
